{"id":668781,"date":"2025-12-29T12:46:04","date_gmt":"2025-12-29T12:46:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=668781"},"modified":"2025-12-29T12:46:04","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T12:46:04","slug":"surse-de-ce-au-parasit-cei-patru-judecatori-sedinta-curtii-constitutionale-in-dosarul-pensiilor-magistratilor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=668781","title":{"rendered":"Surse: De ce au p\u0103r\u0103sit cei patru judec\u0103tori \u0219edin\u021ba Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale \u00een dosarul pensiilor magistra\u021bilor"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/surse-de-ce-au-parasit-cei-patru-judecatori-sedinta-curtii-constitutionale-in-dosarul-pensiilor-magistratilor.jpg\" class=\"ff-og-image-inserted\"><\/div>\n<p data-start=\"570\" data-end=\"1048\" id=\"p-0\">Potrivit unor informa\u021bii ob\u021binute pe surse, patru judec\u0103tori constitu\u021bionali au decis s\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103seasc\u0103 deliber\u0103rile \u201enu pentru a bloca activitatea Cur\u021bii, ci pentru a refuza validarea unei proceduri pe care o consider\u0103 contrar\u0103 legii \u0219i regulamentului de func\u021bionare al CCR\u201d.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1050\" data-end=\"1293\" id=\"p-1\">Sursele indic\u0103 faptul c\u0103 miza real\u0103 a acestui gest, \u00een viziunea celor patru judec\u0103tori, este una institu\u021bional\u0103 \u0219i pe termen lung: \u201eevitarea adopt\u0103rii unei decizii \u00eentr-un ritm accelerat, care ar fi putut vulnerabiliza grav autoritatea \u0219i credibilitatea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale\u201d.<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"1295\" data-end=\"1358\" id=\"chapter-0\">Termene neobi\u0219nuit de scurte \u0219i practici f\u0103r\u0103 precedent<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"1360\" data-end=\"1808\" id=\"p-2\">Sesizarea privind obiec\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate a fost \u00eenregistrat\u0103 vineri, 5 decembrie 2025, la ora 14.45. \u00cen aceea\u0219i zi, pre\u0219edinta Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, Simina T\u0103n\u0103sescu, s-a desemnat judec\u0103tor-raportor \u0219i a fixat termenul de judecat\u0103 pentru 10 decembrie, la mai pu\u021bin de trei zile lucr\u0103toare \u2014 un interval considerat de mai mul\u021bi judec\u0103tori ca fiind atipic \u00een jurispruden\u021ba CCR, mai ales pentru o cauz\u0103 cu impact constitu\u021bional major.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1810\" data-end=\"2095\" id=\"p-3\">La termenul din 10 decembrie, cauza a fost am\u00e2nat\u0103 pe motiv c\u0103 raportul era incomplet. Noul termen a fost stabilit pentru 28 decembrie 2025, \u00eentr-o zi de duminic\u0103, fapt calificat de surse drept lipsit de precedent \u00een procedura de solu\u021bionare a obiec\u021biilor de neconstitu\u021bionalitate.<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"2097\" data-end=\"2140\" id=\"chapter-1\">Divergen\u021b\u0103 procedural\u0103, nu politic\u0103<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"2142\" data-end=\"2602\" id=\"p-4\">\u00cen \u0219edin\u021ba de deliber\u0103ri din 28 decembrie, un judec\u0103tor a solicitat am\u00e2narea pronun\u021b\u0103rii, cerere sus\u021binut\u0103 de al\u021bi trei judec\u0103tori, \u00een baza art. 58 alin. (3) din Legea nr. 47\/1992. Solicitarea viza at\u00e2t completarea raportului, c\u00e2t \u0219i ob\u021binerea unui punct de vedere public al Guvernului care s\u0103 clarifice dac\u0103 legea \u00een discu\u021bie modific\u0103 pensia de serviciu sau, \u00een realitate, abrog\u0103 acest drept, consacrat anterior printr-o jurispruden\u021b\u0103 constant\u0103 a CCR.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"2604\" data-end=\"2925\" id=\"p-5\">Conform celor patru judec\u0103tori, refuzul conducerii Cur\u021bii de a da curs acestei cereri, f\u0103r\u0103 o justificare procedural\u0103 explicit\u0103, a fost perceput ca o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a regulilor interne. \u00cen acest context, cei patru judec\u0103tori au p\u0103r\u0103sit sala de \u0219edin\u021b\u0103, ceea ce a dus la lipsa cvorumului prev\u0103zut de art. 51 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 47\/1992.<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"2927\" data-end=\"2967\" id=\"chapter-2\">De ce nu a fost \u201eblocat\u0103\u201d Curtea<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"2969\" data-end=\"3348\" id=\"p-6\">Sursele subliniaz\u0103 c\u0103 absen\u021ba de la \u0219edin\u021ba din 29 decembrie nu a avut ca scop blocarea activit\u0103\u021bii CCR, ci a reprezentat o form\u0103 de protest institu\u021bional fa\u021b\u0103 de o procedur\u0103 considerat\u0103 nelegal\u0103. Fixarea unui nou termen de solu\u021bionare \u201ede pe o zi pe alta\u201d este v\u0103zut\u0103 ca o abatere de la practica obi\u0219nuit\u0103 a Cur\u021bii \u0219i ca un risc pentru calitatea deliber\u0103rii constitu\u021bionale.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"3350\" data-end=\"3585\" id=\"p-7\">\u00cen opinia judec\u0103torilor care au formulat preciz\u0103rile, participarea la o astfel de \u0219edin\u021b\u0103 ar fi echivalat cu acceptarea tacit\u0103 a unei proceduri neconforme, \u0219i nu cu exercitarea responsabil\u0103 a mandatului de judec\u0103tor constitu\u021bional.<\/p>\n<h2 data-start=\"3587\" data-end=\"3647\" id=\"chapter-3\">Preciz\u0103ri asumate individual de cei patru judec\u0103tori<\/h2>\n<p data-start=\"3649\" data-end=\"3878\" id=\"p-8\">Judec\u0103torii Cristian Deliorga, Gheorghe Stan, Bogdan Licu \u0219i Mihai Busuioc au transmis preciz\u0103ri scrise \u00een care subliniaz\u0103 c\u0103 pozi\u021bia exprimat\u0103 le apar\u021bine exclusiv \u0219i nu reprezint\u0103 o comunicare oficial\u0103 a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"3880\" data-end=\"4239\" id=\"p-9\">Judec\u0103torii indic\u0103 faptul c\u0103 mesajul central al acestui demers este unul clar: respectarea regulilor procedurale nu este o formalitate, ci o garan\u021bie a corectitudinii deciziilor \u0219i a func\u021bion\u0103rii statului de drept. \u00cen cauze cu un impact constitu\u021bional major, timpul necesar reflec\u021biei \u0219i deliber\u0103rii reale este considerat o condi\u021bie esen\u021bial\u0103, nu un obstacol.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Potrivit unor informa\u021bii ob\u021binute pe surse, patru judec\u0103tori constitu\u021bionali au decis s\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103seasc\u0103 deliber\u0103rile \u201enu pentru a bloca activitatea Cur\u021bii, ci pentru a refuza validarea unei proceduri pe care o &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=668781\" class=\"more-link\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":668782,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/668781"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=668781"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/668781\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/668782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=668781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=668781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=668781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}