{"id":708815,"date":"2026-08-18T06:27:04","date_gmt":"2026-08-18T06:27:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=708815"},"modified":"2026-08-18T06:27:04","modified_gmt":"2026-08-18T06:27:04","slug":"harta-rezultatelor-la-bacalaureat-2026-sesiunea-a-doua-diferenta-uriasa-intre-judetele-fruntase-si-cele-codase","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=708815","title":{"rendered":"Harta rezultatelor la Bacalaureat 2026, sesiunea a doua. Diferen\u021b\u0103 uria\u0219\u0103 \u00eentre jude\u021bele frunta\u0219e \u0219i cele coda\u0219e"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"sgb-google-buttons\">\n<div class=\"display-flex justify-center google-logo\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"mg-x-auto\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\" src=\"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/harta-rezultatelor-la-bacalaureat-2026-sesiunea-a-doua-diferenta-uriasa-intre-judetele-fruntase-si-cele-codase.png\" alt><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p id=\"p-0\">Harta promov\u0103rii la examenul de Bacalaureat eviden\u021biaz\u0103 diferen\u021be de peste 15 puncte procentuale \u00eentre jude\u021bele cu cele mai bune \u0219i cele mai slabe rezultate.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-1\">Bra\u0219ovul ocup\u0103 primul loc pe jude\u021be, cu o rat\u0103 de promovare de 42,2%. Urmeaz\u0103 Clujul, cu 41,7%, \u0219i Cara\u0219-Severin, cu 41%.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-2\">Rate de promovare de peste 39% au fost \u00eenregistrate \u0219i \u00een Satu Mare (39,2%), Neam\u021b (39,4%) \u0219i Olt (39,4%), \u00een timp ce Timi\u0219ul a ajuns la 38%, iar Harghita la 38,3%.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-3\">\u00cen Bucure\u0219ti, rata de promovare a fost de 38,7%. \u00centre sectoarele Capitalei exist\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 diferen\u021be importante. Cea mai mare rat\u0103 a fost \u00een sectorul 4, cu 43%, urmat de sectorul 1, cu 41,3%, \u0219i sectorul 5, cu 39,5%. Cele mai mici valori au fost \u00een sectorul 6, cu 36,2%, sectorul 2, cu 36,3%, \u0219i sectorul 3, cu 33,8%.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-4\">La polul opus se afl\u0103 Giurgiu, cu o rat\u0103 de promovare de doar 26,5%. Jude\u021bul este urmat de Ialomi\u021ba, cu 28,3%, \u0219i S\u0103laj, cu 28,5%.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-5\">Datele se refer\u0103 la rezultatele din sesiunea iulie-august 2026 \u0219i includ doar candida\u021bii din promo\u021bia curent\u0103.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-6\">Cele mai bune rezultate:<br \/>1. Bra\u0219ov \u2013 42,2%<br \/>2. Cluj \u2013 41,7%<br \/>3. Cara\u0219-Severin \u2013 41,0%<br \/>4. Neam\u021b\/Olt \u2013 39,4%<br \/>5. Satu Mare \u2013 39,2%<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-7\">Cele mai slabe:<br \/>1. Giurgiu \u2013 26,5%<br \/>2. C\u0103l\u0103ra\u0219i \u2013 27,1%<br \/>3. Ialomi\u021ba \u2013 28,3%<br \/>4. S\u0103laj \u2013 28,5%<br \/>5. Suceava\/Ilfov \u2013 29,6%.<\/p>\n<div class=\"single__excerpt\" readability=\"15.190476190476\"><span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mediafax.ro\/social\/rezultate-bacalaureat-2026-sesiunea-a-doua-rata-de-promovare-a-ajuns-la-un-nivel-record-23792065\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Rata de promovare<\/a><\/span> \u00een sesiunea a doua a examenului de Bacalaureat 2026 este de 33,8%, \u00eenainte de contesta\u021bii, fiind cea mai ridicat\u0103 \u00een actualul format de organizare a examenului, potrivit datelor publicate de Ministerul Educa\u021biei \u0219i Cercet\u0103rii. Anul trecut, rata de promovare dup\u0103 prima afi\u0219are a rezultatelor a fost de 28,4%.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Harta promov\u0103rii la examenul de Bacalaureat eviden\u021biaz\u0103 diferen\u021be de peste 15 puncte procentuale \u00eentre jude\u021bele cu cele mai bune \u0219i cele mai slabe rezultate. Bra\u0219ovul ocup\u0103 primul loc pe jude\u021be, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=708815\" class=\"more-link\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":708816,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/708815"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=708815"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/708815\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/708816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=708815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=708815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=708815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}