{"id":714301,"date":"2026-09-21T12:47:03","date_gmt":"2026-09-21T12:47:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=714301"},"modified":"2026-09-21T12:47:03","modified_gmt":"2026-09-21T12:47:03","slug":"iccj-expertii-judiciari-pot-contesta-in-instanta-solutiile-privind-majorarea-onorariilor-provizorii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=714301","title":{"rendered":"\u00ceCCJ: Exper\u021bii judiciari pot contesta \u00een instan\u021b\u0103 solu\u021biile privind majorarea onorariilor provizorii"},"content":{"rendered":"<div readability=\"50.993849938499\">\n<div class=\"sgb-google-buttons\">\n<div class=\"display-flex justify-center google-logo\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"mg-x-auto\" width=\"30\" height=\"30\" src=\"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/iccj-expertii-judiciari-pot-contesta-in-instanta-solutiile-privind-majorarea-onorariilor-provizorii.png\" alt><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p id=\"p-0\">Decizia a fost pronun\u021bat\u0103 luni de Completul pentru solu\u021bionarea unor chestiuni de drept \u0219i este cuprins\u0103 \u00een Decizia nr. 87\/2026.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-1\">Potrivit \u00ceCCJ, \u00een interpretarea articolului 458 din Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103, expertul judiciar care solicit\u0103 majorarea onorariului provizoriu are \u201ecalitatea procesual\u0103 activ\u0103\u201d de a contesta solu\u021bia instan\u021bei referitoare la propria cerere.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"chapter-0\">Expertul are un drept propriu asupra onorariului<\/h2>\n<p id=\"p-2\">Instan\u021ba suprem\u0103 a explicat c\u0103 expertul care solicit\u0103 majorarea onorariului are un interes propriu \u00een solu\u021bionarea cererii, \u00eentruc\u00e2t este titularul unui drept de crean\u021b\u0103 reprezent\u00e2nd costul expertizei efectuate.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-3\">\u00cen acest context, cererea de majorare a onorariului provizoriu nu reprezint\u0103 doar o m\u0103sur\u0103 de administrare judiciar\u0103, ci are caracterul unei cereri prin care expertul urm\u0103re\u0219te valorificarea dreptului s\u0103u de a \u00eencasa costul integral al lucr\u0103rii.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-4\">\u201eFormularea de c\u0103tre expert a solicit\u0103rii de majorare a onorariului provizoriu \u00eei confer\u0103 acestuia calitatea de petent\u201d, arat\u0103 \u00ceCCJ \u00een comunicatul transmis luni.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-5\">Astfel, expertul beneficiaz\u0103, \u00een cadrul acestei proceduri, de acelea\u0219i drepturi procesuale ca celelalte p\u0103r\u021bi, \u00een baza principiului egalit\u0103\u021bii procesuale prev\u0103zut de Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103 \u0219i a garan\u021biilor dreptului la un proces echitabil.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"chapter-1\">Calea de atac poate viza solu\u021bia privind onorariul<\/h2>\n<p id=\"p-6\">\u00ceCCJ a mai precizat c\u0103 expertul poate ataca solu\u021bia instan\u021bei privind cererea sa de majorare, indiferent dac\u0103 aceasta este cuprins\u0103 \u00eentr-o \u00eencheiere premerg\u0103toare sau \u00een hot\u0103r\u00e2rea prin care instan\u021ba se dez\u00eenveste\u0219te.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-7\">Exercitarea c\u0103ii de atac de c\u0103tre expert nu \u00eempiedic\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 ca celelalte dispozi\u021bii ale hot\u0103r\u00e2rii s\u0103 devin\u0103 definitive, dac\u0103 acestea nu sunt contestate de p\u0103r\u021bile interesate.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-8\">Decizia nr. 87\/2026 a fost pronun\u021bat\u0103 de un complet format din 19 judec\u0103tori ai Sec\u021biei I civile, Sec\u021biei a II-a civile \u0219i Sec\u021biei de contencios administrativ \u0219i fiscal.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-9\">Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea este obligatorie, potrivit articolului 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedur\u0103 civil\u0103, \u0219i urmeaz\u0103 s\u0103 fie publicat\u0103 \u00een Monitorul Oficial, Partea I, dup\u0103 redactare.<\/p>\n<p id=\"p-10\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Decizia a fost pronun\u021bat\u0103 luni de Completul pentru solu\u021bionarea unor chestiuni de drept \u0219i este cuprins\u0103 \u00een Decizia nr. 87\/2026. Potrivit \u00ceCCJ, \u00een interpretarea articolului 458 din Codul de procedur\u0103 &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/?p=714301\" class=\"more-link\">Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":714302,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714301"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=714301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/714301\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/714302"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=714301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=714301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/microscopemedia.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=714301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}